Hamlet the man is dominated by an emotion which is inexpressible because it is in excess of the facts as they appear ……Hamlet is up against the difficulty that his disgust is occasioned by his mother but that his mother is not an adequate equivalent for it; his disgust envelops and exceeds her. It is thus a feeling which he cannot understand; he cannot objectify it, therefore remains to poison life and abstract action. None of the possible actions can satisfy it: and nothing that Shakespeare can do with the plot can express Hamlet for him. According to Eliot, when writer fails to find objective correlatives for the emotions they wish to convey, readers or audiences are left unconvinced, unmoved, or even confused.
Analysis of Eliot’s the Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock
Eliot And His Problems In Shakespeare's Hamlet And His | Bartleby
One of these few people is T. He firmly believes. Hamlet's appeal to audiences almost certainly stems from his many human weaknesses. The one for which he is best known is indecisiveness, but his inconsistency may well be an even more outstanding characteristic. Eliot, in , wrote an essay on Hamlet that is still cited as a noted critique of Shakespeare's great tragedy. Eliot argued that Hamlet is an artistic failure.
In literary criticism, an objective correlative is a group of things or events which systematically represent emotions. The theory of the objective correlative as it relates to literature was largely developed through the writings of the poet and literary critic T. Eliot , who is associated with the literary group called the New Critics. Helping define the objective correlative, Eliot's essay " Hamlet and His Problems ",  republished in his book The Sacred Wood: Essays on Poetry and Criticism discusses his view of Shakespeare 's incomplete development of Hamlet's emotions in the play Hamlet.
Hamlet and His Problems is an essay written by T. Eliot in that offers a critical reading of Hamlet. The essay is also an example of Eliot's use of what became known as new criticism. Eliot begins the essay by stating that the primary problem of Hamlet is actually the play itself, with its main character being only a secondary issue. Eliot goes on to note that the play enjoys critical success because the character of Hamlet appeals to a particular kind of creatively minded critic.