Peter Singer argues against animals cruelty, discrimination, and animals equal rights. Singer uses philosophy to teach and educate others on his point of view. Singer points out that animals have rights too and supports animals just like he does with Black Liberation, Gay Liberation, and Women Liberation. It is a demand that we cease to regard the exploitation.
Feminist Environmental Philosophy (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)
We have animals undergo these horrible experiments for the sake of science just because they are beneath us in every way. Singer wrote an overall good analysis because he did have authoritative evidence, and he did state both the arguments and the counterarguments, though he did rely too much on emotion. Singer also makes two major points which are communication and pain. Singer did well in bringing in the experts. In bringing them up he not only added credibility to his essay, but he also got your attention. By getting your attention I mean that people always look when you see an expert anywhere. People stop to listen to them think about it and then judge them.
I think moral treatments of any living thing should just be left to what the people and our brains think is morally right or wrong. In order for our species to thrive and expand our knowledge we would need to test certain chemicals on animals because they are disposable. Sure humans are also disposable both since we are barely reaching the pinnacle of basic human right, I doubt people want to be volunteering other people to have experiment done on…. If we can use glass testing, then why would we continue to risk animals to lives to save our own? In glass testing, the results produce more accurate results than an animal test would because human cells can be used.
Milian was because he was speaking out against the other terrorist acts going on in Miami because many were upset with the control of Fidel Castro in Cuba. For the most part, Domestic Terrorism is still true to its definition of acts only carried out by residents within the U. This position echos his stance as an Utilitarian because the moral theory of Utilitarianism weighs the sum of happiness and least unhappiness in a holistic approach that reaches beyond mere inclusion of human beings.