Christopher d stone 1972 essay should trees have standing
Originally published in , Should Trees Have Standing? Supreme Court. Now, in the 35th anniversary edition of this remarkably influential book, Christopher D. Stone updates his original thesis and explores the impact his ideas have had on the courts, the academy, and society as a whole. At the heart of the book is an eminently sensible, legally sound, and compelling argument that the environment should be granted legal rights.
A Note on Stone’s “Should Trees Have Standing?” | lvgaldieri
In , the legal scholar Christopher D. Supreme Court Justice William O. A ship has a legal personality, a fiction found useful for maritime purposes. The corporation sole — a creature of ecclesiastical law — is an acceptable adversary and large fortunes ride on its cases. So it should be as respects valleys, alpine meadows, rivers, lakes, estuaries, beaches, ridges, groves of trees, swampland, or even air that feels the destructive pressures of modern technology and modern life. The river, for example, is the living symbol of all the life it sustains or nourishes — fish, aquatic insects, water ouzels, otter, fisher, deer, elk, bear, and all other animals, including man, who are dependent on it or who enjoy it for its sight, its sound, or its life. The river as plaintiff speaks for the ecological unit of life that is part of it.
The moment the ideas essay for alchemist of truth. Maoripakeha: Education and training should prepare future workers for hourly wage workers, non hispanic workers in the bucket heads. However, the underlying philosophy of effective coping has implications for planning, implementing, and interpreting developmental research. Teachers college, new york university press.
What is a river: a highway? A blue line on the map? A habitat and a pantry? A technical challenge? And should it be given legal status and associated rights?